Incidental diagnosis of bladder cancer in a national observational study in spain.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy in Spain. The aims of this study were: to identify the proportion of patients diagnosed with BC incidentally or after symptomatic presentation in a contemporary period in Spain; to compare demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics between these groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a multi-centre observational study of 26 hospitals in the Spanish National Health System of all BCs newly diagnosed in 2011. The study represented 21.5% of the Spanish population and hospitals were selected in proportion to Spain's regions to ensure a representative sample. Patients were categorized by whether the cancer was diagnosed incidentally or after symptomatic presentation and baseline demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: 2472 were newly diagnosed with BC at the 26 participating Spanish hospitals with 308 (12.5%) of cases diagnosed incidentally and 2164 (87.5%) diagnosed after symptomatic presentation. No differences were observed between patients diagnosed incidentally vs. symptomatically in terms of demographics or measured co-morbidities. Compared to symptomatically diagnosed bladder tumours, those diagnosed incidentally were more likely to have a papillary appearance, to be significantly smaller, and less likely to have positive/suspicious cytology. Additionally, incidentally diagnosed bladder tumours were less likely to be muscle-invasive (11.7% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.01) nor aggressive at pathology, with 33.6% Grade 3 compared to 50.1%, (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a significant percentage (12.5%) of new bladder cancer diagnosis made incidentally in a representative sample of the Spanish population. These tumours exhibited less aggressive pathologic characteristics than their symptomatic counterparts.

Is Tumor Budding a New Predictor for Early Cystectomy in pT1 High-Grade Bladder Cancer?

Background & Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the risk of progression in high-grade T1 (HGT1) tumors using tumor budding (TB) and other standard clinical and histological features. TB is defined as an isolated cancer cell or a cluster composed of fewer than 5 cells scattered in the stroma and is usually used as a strong predictor of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS: This is an observational longitudinal cohort study involving 168 consecutive patients with HGT1 between 2013 and 2016. Cox regression was performed to analyze the relationship between the clinical and histological features and progression. All slides were blindly assessed by 2 genitourinary pathologists. Budding was determined to be positive when the number of buds was equal to or greater than 6. RESULTS: The median age was 75 years; 152 (90.5%) patients were men, and 49 (29.2%) were positive for TB. At a median follow-up time of 35 months, 33 patients (19.6%) showed progression. Progression was observed in 32.7% of the patients positive for TB and in only 14.3% of those who were negative (p = 0.006). TB was significantly associated with the endoscopic tumor pattern (TP) (papillary/solid) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Univariate analysis showed that TB, carcinoma in situ (CIS), TP, LVI, sub-staging, and BCG induction predict progression. The multivariate analysis showed that TB (p = 0.032, hazard ratio 2.1), CIS, TP, and lack of BCG induction were significant for progression. CONCLUSIONS: TB is a new and significant pathological variable for predicting progression in HGT1 tumors and can be easily introduced in clinical practice. Its inclusion in the TNM system should be carefully considered, as it may aid early cystectomy decisions.